Inference acceleration framework: detailed explanation of ONNX Runtime, TensorRT, and OpenVINO
Introduction
After training an excellent deep learning model, only half of the story is completed. When this model is actually deployed to servers, mobile phones, cameras or smart speakers, you will immediately encounter a hard nut - inference speed. Training frameworks (such as PyTorch, TensorFlow) are inherently better at backpropagation and debugging training. However, for online inference that "only runs forward once", they appear bloated, slow and consume resources.
At this time, a specialized reasoning acceleration framework is needed. They are like "turbochargers" for model implementation. Through a series of technologies such as calculation graph optimization, operator fusion, hardware instruction set deep adaptation, and quantization compression, they can reduce latency to the extreme and make throughput soar. Whether it is millisecond-level decision-making for autonomous driving or real-time video analysis for security monitoring, this link is inseparable.
📂 Stage: Stage 2 - Deep Learning Vision Basics (CNN) 🔗 Related chapters: 模型轻量化 · Web 视觉应用
1. Overview of inference acceleration framework
1.1 Training vs. inference, why can’t we use the native framework directly?
For example: training is like building an F1 car, which requires various sensors and engineers to adjust, and can brake and reverse at any time (back propagation); while inference is like sprinting on the track, we only need to step on the accelerator (forward propagation), the faster the better.
The main problems with direct inference in native frameworks are:
- Low operating efficiency: There is no extreme optimization for the target hardware, and the GPU/CPU utilization cannot increase.
- Waste of resources: The calculation graph during training retains a large number of nodes that are only useful for updating weights, which are all a burden during inference.
- Inconvenient deployment: It is inconvenient to plug PyTorch models directly into C++ services, and cross-platform support is also limited.
Therefore, we need a specialized inference framework to "slim down, adjust, and package" the model into the best form suitable for specific hardware.
1.2 Quick overview of mainstream frameworks
In actual combat, the usual process is: first export the model from any training framework to a unified ONNX format, then feed it to ONNX Runtime to run quickly, and then switch to TensorRT or OpenVINO when extreme performance requirements are required.
2. ONNX: The “master key” for model exchange
ONNX (Open Neural Network Exchange) is an open standard that defines a set of universal graph representations so that models can be seamlessly migrated between different frameworks and different hardware. You can train the model in PyTorch, export ONNX, and then run it in C#, Java, and mobile terminals—even on accelerators from different manufacturers, greatly reducing deployment confusion.
2.1 Getting started with converting PyTorch to ONNX
PyTorch has a very friendly export function built-in. The core onlytorch.onnx.export. The following example demonstrates the complete conversion and verification process:
After exporting, you will get a.onnxfile, which can then be loaded using any inference engine that supports ONNX.
3. ONNX Runtime: The first choice for running the model
ONNX Runtime is a high-performance inference engine maintained by Microsoft. Its biggest advantage is that it is versatile and easy to use. With it installed, you can switch computing backends with one click: CPU, CUDA, TensorRT, DirectML... One set of code can be enjoyed on multiple hardware. Its performance is good enough for most rapid deployment scenarios.
3.1 Quickly start reasoning
3.2 Several tips to make reasoning faster
These small settings can improve the throughput even further without changing the model.
4. Which framework to choose? A picture to help you make decisions
In actual projects, we rarely decide which framework to use based on our head, but rather what hardware is used for deployment.
Generally speaking, you first use ONNX Runtime to run through the pipeline, and then decide whether to use TensorRT or OpenVINO to squeeze out the hardware based on the stress test results.
Some general deployment optimization suggestions
-
Try half-precision (FP16) first On the GPU, FP16 can double the speed while maintaining almost the same accuracy; it is standard on edge devices.
-
Batch inference is a good friend Putting multiple independent requests into a batch for reasoning together as much as possible can significantly improve GPU utilization and reduce average latency.
-
Don’t take out the operations that can be put into the picture Preprocessing such as normalization, scaling, and color space conversion should be integrated into ONNX or the engine's own pre- and post-processing graphs as much as possible to reduce data transfer between the CPU and GPU.
-
Warm up at startup Before the service goes online, run a few empty inferences randomly to complete one-time overheads such as model loading, memory allocation, and Kernel compilation in advance to avoid the first inference request being labeled as "slow".
Related tutorials
Summarize
The inference acceleration framework is the key bridge connecting research experiments and industrial implementation:
- ONNX is the cornerstone of the bridge, breaking down the barriers between different frameworks.
- ONNX Runtime is a universal Swiss army knife that covers most common deployment scenarios.
- TensorRT / OpenVINO are professional racing engines. When you have extreme requirements for performance, they are the best choice.
💡 Important reminder: There is no "universally optimal" framework, only the "most suitable for current hardware and scenarios" framework. Before deployment, please be sure to do a complete Benchmark with your own data!
🔗 Extended reading

